Guide

Hiring manager or recruiter?

They are not interchangeable, and approaching the wrong one wastes the approach. The difference is simple: one owns the role, the other owns the process.

The hiring manager owns the role

They will manage whoever is hired. They wrote or shaped the job description, they decide what “good” looks like, and they make the final call. They are usually not in the applicant tracking system all day, which means a direct note stands out rather than joining a queue. They can also do something no recruiter can: decide you are interesting enough to talk to regardless of what the filters said.

The recruiter owns the process

Internal recruiters run the pipeline — screening, scheduling, offers, and often the first filter. They see every applicant, which means they are both the most informed person about where you stand and the busiest. They can move you forward, unstick a stalled application and tell you what is actually being weighted. What they usually cannot do is overrule the hiring manager's judgement about fit.

Who to approach, and when

Hiring manager, after applying
The highest-leverage single message. Short, specific, and about why your background maps to their problem.
Recruiter, when you are already in process
For status, for timelines, and for what the team is actually weighing.
Both, carefully
It is fine to contact both. It is not fine to send the same message twice, or to ask the recruiter something you just asked the manager.
Neither, in bulk
A note that reads as a template performs worse than no note at all, because it is evidence about how you work.

A note on agency recruiters

An external or agency recruiter works for the employer, not for you, and is paid on placement. That is not a reason to avoid them, but it does change the advice: they are a route to roles, not an advocate for your candidacy, and they cannot tell the hiring manager to reconsider you.

Find out who actually owns the role

The name, the title and a verified address, for every job you apply to.